A response has now surfaced from one of Blord’s lawyers.
Reacting to the claims, the lawyer dismissed VDM’s statements and made it clear he would not engage in any public back-and-forth. According to him, he is a learned individual and cannot be seen dragging issues with a layman, adding that he is “too big” to be involved in such controversy.
he was also quoted saying
“Blord only came out to claim he trademarked ‘Ratel’ just to get under VDM’s skin. In reality, he never actually trademarked it. This whole fight wouldn’t have escalated to this level if VDM hadn’t rushed to the police, crying that Blord used his name for criminal activities.”

He further stated that the issue between VDM and Blord was originally meant to remain an online matter and should never have escalated to the point of legal action or court involvement.

This directly contradicts VDM’s earlier narrative, where he suggested that Blord’s camp, including legal representatives, had been reaching out behind the scenes.